The notion that Europe and other advanced economies are suffering secular stagnation is gaining traction. This column by Larry Summers – first published in the Vox eBook “Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes and Cures” – explains the idea. It argues that a decline in the full-employment real interest rate coupled with low inflation could indefinitely prevent the attainment of full employment.
Capital flows to emerging markets have been very volatile since the global financial crisis. This has kindled debates on whether – and how – to better manage cross-border capital flows. In this column, the authors examine the role of capital account restrictions in both source and recipient countries in taming destabilising capital flows. The results indicate that capital account restrictions at either end can significantly lower the volume of cross-border flows.
Sound corporate governance is essential for a well-functioning banking system and the integrity of financial markets. This column discusses the corporate governance of Italian banks, its regulatory framework, and the specific challenges arising from the role played by foundations and large cooperatives. Although Italian banks have recently made progress in improving their corporate governance, more needs to be done.
Global current-account imbalances narrowed substantially over the past eight years. As a result, the systemic risks associated with these imbalances have decreased. This column argues that despite this narrowing, the net creditor and debtor positions diverged further. Some large debtor economies remain exposed to changes in market confidence. Containing remaining imbalances requires a rebalance in global demand.
The ECB conducted a comprehensive assessment of banks and identified capital shortfalls for 25 banks, totalling €25 billion. In this column, the authors provide a number of benchmark stress tests to estimate capital shortfalls. The analyses suggest possible capital shortfalls between €80 billion and more than €700 billion depending on the model. They find a negative correlation between their benchmark estimates and the regulatory capital shortfall, and a positive one between the benchmarks and the regulatory estimates of losses. This suggests that regulatory stress test outcomes are potentially affected by the discretion of national regulators.
Other Recent Articles:
- Exploding wealth inequality in the United States
- The audit society and its enemies
- Climate change: Lessons for our future from the distant past
- Advanced economies’ sovereign debt: 100 years of data
- What drives micro and macro volatility?
- Monetary policy and inequality in the US
- Macroeconomic policy mix in the transatlantic economy
- The ECB as lender of last resort?
- Forward guidance: Human plans and divine laughter
- Sovereign-debt relief and its aftermath: The 1930s, the 1990s, the future?
- Keynes’ asset management: King’s College, 1921–1946
- China can benefit from a generous unfunded pension system
- EU exports and the role of SMEs
- How insurers differ from banks: Implications for systemic regulation
- Parents, television, and cultural change
- Regret and economic decision-making
- Short-run impulsiveness versus long-run impatience
- Maximising happiness does not maximise welfare
- Mental illness: The great hidden problem in today's society
- EU bank deleveraging