The subprime lending crisis in the US triggered a broad financial panic that lead to the global recession. Domestically, it meant bankruptcy and disaster for many households. This column analyses racial discrimination in subprime lending. Careful estimation of a detailed dataset reveals across-lender effects to have substantially disadvantaged black and Hispanic borrowers.
Since the Global Crisis, support has grown for the use of time-varying capital requirements as a macroprudential policy tool. This column examines the effect of bank-specific, time-varying capital requirements in the UK between 1990 and 2011. In response to increased capital requirements, banks gradually increase their capital ratios to restore their original buffers above the regulatory minimum, reducing lending temporarily as they do so. The largest effects are on commercial real estate lending, followed by lending to other corporates and then secured lending to households.
Central banks’ exchange rate interventions are typically attributed to precautionary, prudential, or mercantilist motives. This column documents the prevalence of an alternative motive – that of stabilising the exchange rate – in emerging markets, where, despite heavy intervention, the Global Crisis saw important deviations of the real exchange rate from its equilibrium value. Exchange rate intervention is shown to be effective, but more so at containing appreciations than depreciations.
European migration exhibits a bias towards low-skilled workers, whereas the US attracts the majority of the world’s skilled migrants. At the same time, the welfare system in Europe is more generous than the one in the US. This column describes an analytical framework that can explain the existence of these differences. Whether a group (union) of member states competes or coordinates its policies has an impact on the skill composition of its migrants and the generosity of the welfare system.
Switzerland has had consistently low tax rates and a remarkably stable income distribution, although in the last 20 years the share of top incomes has risen. This column documents that the top 0.01%’s share doubled, meaning Switzerland is similar to European countries in terms of the top 1%’s income share, but closer to the US for higher top incomes. Labour incomes have grown in importance among top income earners. At the same time, however, top incomes have exhibited large and possibly increasing variations over the business cycle.
Other Recent Articles:
- Publish or be damned – or why central banks need to say more about the path of their policy rates
- What is driving the ‘African growth miracle’?
- Why we need a fiscal backstop
- Europe’s Russian connections
- Structural reform lowers country risk
- Exit spillover: How to handle the coming tightening
- European research and innovation spending since the Crisis
- Walking wounded: The British economy in the aftermath of World War I
- Are large headquarters unproductive?
- The role of corporate saving in global rebalancing
- Firm growth and large jumps
- New-breed global investors and financial stability
- Minority mortgage market and the Crisis
- How can we measure media power?
- Pricing and EZ membership: Evidence from Latvia
- Nominal GDP targeting for developing nations
- Ballooning finance
- How to jumpstart the Eurozone economy
- Maternal grief and child outcomes
- The economics of density: Evidence from the Berlin Wall