When looking at the potential effects of a trade policy, trade economists usually insist on the real income effects, often dismissing its unemployment effects as of second-order importance, whereas policymakers and the public at large tend to voice concerns about jobs gained or lost. This column presents a quantitative framework that weighs both concerns, which is especially important when real incomes and the unemployment rates move in the same direction following a trade reform.
Céline Carrère, Anja Grujovic, Frédéric Robert-Nicoud, Thursday, September 3, 2015 - 00:00
CEP invites academics and practitioners to submit an extended abstract until August 15, 2015 to firstname.lastname@example.org. Further information is at the link below.
- Ejaz Ghani, Lead Economist at The World Bank
- Marion Jansen, Chief Economist at International Trade Centre
- Sebastien Miroudot, Trade Policy Analyst at the OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate
- Sebastian Saez, Senior Trade Economist at The World Bank
- Pierre Sauvé, Director of External Programmes and Academic Partnerships at the WTI
- Johannes Schwarzer, Trade Policy Fellow at CEP
M. Sait Akman, Simon J Evenett, Patrick Low, Tuesday, April 7, 2015 - 00:00
Jason Furman, Friday, February 20, 2015 - 00:00
Lionel Fontagné, Sébastien Jean, Sunday, November 16, 2014 - 00:00
Jayant Menon, Monday, November 10, 2014 - 00:00
David Saha, Sunday, July 20, 2014 - 00:00
An early draft of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) sparked an intensive public debate over possible advantages and disadvantages. This column reviews some arguments in favour of the Partnership and against it. While there is some debate over how large the economic benefit could be in the face of already relatively low trade barriers, critics claim that the deal will lower standards of consumer protection, provision of public services, and environmental protection in the EU.
Anabel González, Thursday, May 29, 2014 - 00:00
Mega-regional negotiations will underwrite global governance on 21st-century trade issues and facilitate the proliferation of global and regional value chains. This column writes that Latin American countries would gain from a strengthened and effective WTO to help mitigate the friction and fragmentation that may result from the mega-regionals.
Dennis Novy, Wednesday, May 28, 2014 - 00:00
The negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership are about a year old and making only slow progress. This column argues that TTIP is a long-run project that will probably take several years to complete. Despite its significance to global trade, without support from the top echelons of government it might falter.
L Alan Winters, Thursday, May 22, 2014 - 00:00
Most economists cheer the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership that the EU is currently negotiating with the US. This column argues it is a pity that TTIP and other mega-regional agreements have emerged. It sees the exclusion of China in particular as an existential threat to the world trading system. It urges policymakers in the EU to focus instead on the world trading system or even consider an agreement with China.
Vinod K. Aggarwal, Simon J Evenett, Friday, November 15, 2013 - 00:00
Revelations about American spying in Europe – and the backlash they have produced – threatens ongoing EU-US trade talks. This column assesses that threat, highlighting often-overlooked factors, not the least of which is the poor record of allowing security policy concerns to influence trade relations.
Lucian Cernat, Friday, November 8, 2013 - 00:00
Trade agenda consists of new and old themes, often closely intertwined. Among the new themes, mega-FTAs– in particular the Trans-Pacific and the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership – have been especially popular. This column discusses the nature of mega-FTAs and their relationship with the multilateral rules. The column concludes that such FTAs promote deep regional integration, but also have positive impact on non-members.